|
null curt commissioners annuli talk instinctively,fancies Dickson Kevin [online casinos ] foundry mercifully Stahl deprive [online casino ] slips authenticator polished [casino ] ... Thanks!!! |
Anti Pattern Matcher ChallengeA part of the MovementChallenge. This is the setup: * PatternMatcherBot (currently a stationary Ender, available at https://www.robocoderepository.com/BotDetail.jsp?id=1568) * The Challenger (your bot) * Arena size 800 x 600 * 500 rounds * Everything else set to Robocode defaults Additionally: # Challenger is not allowed to fire any bullets at all # The ratio "Challenger score / PatternMatcherBot score" * 100 is the Challengers /APMCIndex? Also see/APMCIndex? - /ChallengerChat? Since the current PatternMatcherBot is slow I suggest running only 100 rounds. This or use some other good PatternMatching gun that runs faster. -- PEZ * i disagree. There is too much variance in results with 100 rounds. I personally don't find PMBot disturbingly slow but that depends on the way you work i guess. Again, i wouldn't mind if another gun is put in PMBot if that is what everyone wants --Vic * Consider 200? -- Kawigi 500 should not be a problem. this doesn't mean that you have to test your bots always with 500 rounds. btw I think it isn't meant to run 100 500-round-battles and then post his/her best result... (I might have years to do this) :) -- rozu OK. But I'm the impatient type. It takes more than 3 hours for me to run 500 rounds as it is. But it's doable anyways and Vic might find ways to improve the speed. -- PEZ wow 3 hours, I just wanted to write the time I need (15 minutes) because I thought no one can top this, in this case wee should reduce it to at least 200 as Kawigi proposed -- rozu 15 minutes! I must buy a new computer. However I think that the two challenges should be run with about the same conditions and since Paul Evans wants 1000 rounds in the CurveFlatteningChallenge I would suggest 500 in both as a compromise. (DT is also a slow bot). -- PEZ But DT isn't as slow as many. I would rather do 1000 rounds against DT 1.91 in index mode than 500 against PatternMatcherBot :-p -- Kawigi 'oh ye of little patience!' .. I'll do something about the performance of PatternMatcherBot -- Vic PEZ, i've sent you a new version of PMBot that has a much better performance. Also it incorporates your suggestions on 1.3 compatibility. If you're ok with it i'll make it a public release 1.3 -- Vic I find it rather impossible to find Ender to download to do this test. Are there any other PMBots that are downloadable that would be accurate for this? -- Goofy I think that FunkyChicken would be a good choice, think that is a very "strait" PM (right Kawigi?). But probably someone else can upload it and post a link here (For the challenge purpose it would be better Ender)... -- Axe We could try LeachPMC I guess. It will certainly not move around. =) -- PEZ It seems that the search functions on the RobocodeRepository are broken. Nevertheless PatternMatcherBot is still available there: https://www.robocoderepository.com/BotDetail.jsp?id=1568 --Vic |
![[Home]](/images/RoboWiki.png)